User Tag List
Results 101 to 110 of 125
-
10-26-2021, 09:05 PM #101
-
10-27-2021, 08:28 AM #102
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- FL, rolling in early May
- Posts
- 8,142
- Blog Entries
- 19
- Mentioned
- 90 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Marcy & Gary
2014 Grand Design - Reflection 303RLS
2022 GMC 3500 Denali Duramax Longbed SRW
2015 GMC Denali 3500 - Retired
2003 F350 - retired
Michigan
We're in trouble now, the dog are bloggin'!
https://3dogsandatrailer.wordpress.com/
-
10-27-2021, 08:58 AM #103
- Join Date
- Feb 2021
- Posts
- 579
- Mentioned
- 5 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I did a lot of looking around the first part of the year on the 3500's, thinking about replacing my short bed RAM 3500 diesel with a long bed. My truck is a tool, and I look at the truck for what I want, not who's brand it is. I found that RAM has the best payload of the three, with Chevy and Ford about equal and usually a couple of hundred pounds less with equal equipment. Main reason is RAM has a higher GVWR, my 3500 short bed has a 11,800 GVWR giving me a payload of 3750, it is a Laramie with a sunroof and the HO/Aisin. Counter that with RAM has the shortest bed, and wheelbase.
Looking at everything, unscientifically, I found the GMC/Chevy had the best payload for the 2500, RAM for the 3500 SRW, and all of them for the dually, as they all use the same GVWR and it comes down if you put the kitchen sink option in.2023 Chevy 3500HD CC SB 4x4 Dmax
2021 GD 320G with 8K axles
-
10-27-2021, 09:09 AM #104
- Join Date
- Feb 2021
- Posts
- 579
- Mentioned
- 5 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Not true. The HO uses a larger injector, and comparing my 3500 HO with several other 3500 SO pulling 15K lbs, I am usually about 2-3 mpg less. Unloaded it can be 3-4 mpg less. But the HO, of course is more capable, but for me, not really needed for about 15K lb trailer or less.
2023 Chevy 3500HD CC SB 4x4 Dmax
2021 GD 320G with 8K axles
-
10-27-2021, 09:31 AM #105
- Join Date
- Sep 2021
- Location
- Manitoba Canada
- Posts
- 144
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
10-27-2021, 09:34 AM #106
- Join Date
- Sep 2021
- Location
- Manitoba Canada
- Posts
- 144
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
-
10-27-2021, 11:26 AM #107
-
10-29-2021, 01:14 AM #108
I’m considering ordering a Ram 3500 Diesel HO short bed crew cab for my 303 like you have. Short bed fits in my garage compared to a long bed. I now have a 15 ram 2500 standard diesel short bed. Last week drove from Provo Utah to St. George getting about 11 mpg and back getting about 8+ mpg uphill. Do you think the 3500 HO would give me worse gas mileage or better because of less stress on the engine?. I know I would be in my payload weight a lot better. Are you saying the 3500 HO would be better for a trailer exceeding 15000 pounds? Then maybe a standard diesel for under 15000? Were you saying worse MPG when not pulling a trailer with a 3500 HO?
Lynne and Lance
2023 Solitude 2930 Current and Forever
2018 Reflection 303RLS Traded In
2016 Reflection 297RS. Traded In
2022 Ram 3500 6.7 Diesel CC SRW SB
2015 Ram 2500 6.7 Diesel Traded In
-
10-29-2021, 01:17 AM #109
I missed up. My previous post was for Wileykid. I’ll take anyone’s input.
Thanks
LanceLynne and Lance
2023 Solitude 2930 Current and Forever
2018 Reflection 303RLS Traded In
2016 Reflection 297RS. Traded In
2022 Ram 3500 6.7 Diesel CC SRW SB
2015 Ram 2500 6.7 Diesel Traded In
-
10-29-2021, 08:49 AM #110
- Join Date
- Feb 2021
- Posts
- 579
- Mentioned
- 5 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
One would think that with the bigger engine, it would use less energy, hence less fuel, but problem with our trucks is we are still moving "X" amount of weight, and both engines need to produce a minimum of "X" power. While it is easier with the additional power of the HO, it takes more to run all the bigger stuff in the HO, and it is a heavier engine and tranny (around 250 lbs heavier then the SO/68RFE). At some point it would be true that the HO should get better fuel mileage because of that, we just are not at that point in what we pull.
IMHO, loads under around 15-16,000 lbs do not need the HO as the SO is more than capable. Above that, the HO moves the weight better, although the SO will still do the job. If you are using the truck as a daily driver, or limited towing, the 68RFE tranny shifts a lot smoother than the Aisin.
Of course if you want to tackle any mountain with enough power to almost laugh at it, the HO is for you.
I bought the HO, because I wanted the bigger engine, not that I really needed it, and the approximately 2 mpg less pulling, and 4 unloaded is my penalty. I do keep an eye on the other brands with the 10 spd trannys, but so far they do not have the payload in the SRW short bed I need like the RAM has. They do have similar power capability, and coupled with the 10 spd, it gives them a lot better fuel mileage, and tranny shifting.
Edit: Just to add, if you can, the 3500 in either flavor would be great for you. Unless you get a truck with every option, worrying about weight will be a thing of the past with your trailer. My truck is a Laramie (4x4) with an aftermarket 48 gallon fuel tank (replaced 32 gallon OEM), and with me, full fuel, and hitch (180 lbs), I still have 3,200 lbs of payload (3750 lb sticker).Last edited by Wileykid; 10-29-2021 at 09:28 AM.
2023 Chevy 3500HD CC SB 4x4 Dmax
2021 GD 320G with 8K axles
Slide actuator failure on 2021...
Today, 06:49 AM in Slide Systems