User Tag List

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 79
  1. #61
    Big Traveler
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Gaffney, SC
    Posts
    1,134
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Airrace View Post
    Some recent news from the EAA Sport Aviation magazine (Dec 2020). A new startup company called Turbotech in France is building small turbine engines for small aircraft along with turbine powered generators for hybrid aircraft. The generator spins at the same speed as the turbine so no gear reduction with the total package weighing 254 lbs. (less than my 5.5kw Onan, 290 lbs.) and produces 55kw. NOT 5.5 but 55 kw. It runs on Jet fuel, diesel or biofuel. Of course this unit still uses fossil fuel but a different possibility for a large electric vehicle.
    Now we're talking man! This is exactly the kind of tech that will make a semi (or big pickup towing an RV) feasible in the short-mid term. I say that because, maybe, long enough term, we figure out ways to deal with the "math" issues I posted above and pure EV semis, but something like this can get there in the here and now.

    55KW means that little engine is putting out about 110HP! Amazing for something that light.

  2. #62
    Seasoned Camper Chewwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    280
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Overtaxed View Post
    55KW means that little engine is putting out about 110HP! Amazing for something that light.
    Just a little off.

    55kW = 73.8hp

  3. #63
    Big Traveler
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Gaffney, SC
    Posts
    1,134
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chewwi View Post
    Just a little off.

    55kW = 73.8hp
    Touche. However, with losses in the generation, 2HP per KW is a decent approximation. Perfect generator efficiency, you're right; but practically, you'll need more than 74HP to spin a 55KW generator (assuming it's using all 55KW).

  4. #64
    Seasoned Camper Airrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    @Overtaxed @Chewwi
    The magazine article does say 74hp. Also working on a 90 kw (121hp). They claim that the fuel burn is 4-6 gallons an hour at cruise. What that will convert to in a ground vehicle I'm not sure.
    Lyle & Judy and Annie the Westie
    Retired (Government employee/USMC/USAFR, Ret) & Retired (insurance industry)
    2018 F-350 CC LB DRW 4X4 6.7 (3.55)(Reese 18k "puck system")
    2018 Solitude 310GK (5500 Onan Genset)
    2020 F-150 SCSB XLT 2.7L 10 speed

  5. #65
    Seasoned Camper Chewwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    280
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Overtaxed View Post
    Touche. However, with losses in the generation, 2HP per KW is a decent approximation. Perfect generator efficiency, you're right; but practically, you'll need more than 74HP to spin a 55KW generator (assuming it's using all 55KW).
    Electrical losses are already accounted for. The output of the turbine generator is 55kW DC. The Turbotech website states the final output is from a power electronic converter which indicates the turbine is driving an AC generator that feeds the converter. Industrial motors and electric generators are typically greater than 95% efficiency. The inefficiencies in this machine are almost all on the turbine side, not the generator side.

  6. #66
    Seasoned Camper Airrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The web site says it is "ultra quite", but not sure what that really means. The helicopter engines in hydroplanes seem to be quite compared to an APU in a C-141 or C-17 (90kw plus air) and where does the heat go? While still using fossil fuel, is the cost of an all electric truck comparable to the current 1 ton trucks we currently drive. And will we need around 600kw to meet the 450 hp we have now? Will we need that much? I'm not sure how all this translates back and forth. I get the feeling I'm comparing apples and walnuts to each other.
    Lyle & Judy and Annie the Westie
    Retired (Government employee/USMC/USAFR, Ret) & Retired (insurance industry)
    2018 F-350 CC LB DRW 4X4 6.7 (3.55)(Reese 18k "puck system")
    2018 Solitude 310GK (5500 Onan Genset)
    2020 F-150 SCSB XLT 2.7L 10 speed

  7. #67
    Seasoned Camper Chewwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    280
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Airrace View Post
    The web site says it is "ultra quite", but not sure what that really means. The helicopter engines in hydroplanes seem to be quite compared to an APU in a C-141 or C-17 (90kw plus air) and where does the heat go? While still using fossil fuel, is the cost of an all electric truck comparable to the current 1 ton trucks we currently drive. And will we need around 600kw to meet the 450 hp we have now? Will we need that much? I'm not sure how all this translates back and forth. I get the feeling I'm comparing apples and walnuts to each other.
    Ultra quiet is a relative term and it could still be deafening.

    I’m pretty sure you know where the heat goes based on your profile (air racing and USAFR).

    If you want the equivalent of 450 hp, you will need about 336 kW (not 600kW).

  8. #68
    Big Traveler
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Gaffney, SC
    Posts
    1,134
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chewwi View Post
    Ultra quiet is a relative term and it could still be deafening.

    I’m pretty sure you know where the heat goes based on your profile (air racing and USAFR).

    If you want the equivalent of 450 hp, you will need about 336 kW (not 600kW).
    Without batteries, yes, you'd need a big generator. But the reason diesel-electric is so interesting is because you can store that electric (in a battery pack) so that the peak loads (starting from a stop, for example) can be serviced at 1000HP using the batteries, and then, during cruise operations, when you maybe need 100HP to keep rolling, the generator can charge the batteries. Driving is very variable on demand, going up a huge hill with a massive load, might take every HP the engine can put out, however, going downhill on the other side, instead of 450HP, you actually are a negative HP (and, like most electric cars, you can charge the batteries from it). Batteries allow you to harness that energy and deal well with the fluctuating power requirements of a typical drive, you want huge bursts of power followed by a relatively modest power consumption once at cruising speed. That's why you could get away with something like a 100HP generator instead of a 400HP diesel engine, you can run that generator flat out at 100HP the entire time it's running charging batteries, and then, during cruise, which might only take 50HP, the batteries gain a charge. Taking off from a stop, which could be 1000HP, you can use the extra energy stored in the batteries. It's really about finding the right balance, how big a genny to get "unlimited range" without being too big (using too much fuel). How big a battery to provide enough juice for the peak loads and hold enough generated electric to be usable. Too much battery is wasteful, too much genny is wasteful, and too little of each, well.. Eventually you come to a stop (or only have 100HP to start your rig rolling, good luck with that!).

  9. #69
    Site Sponsor SolarPoweredRV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    2,054
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Overtaxed View Post
    Without batteries, yes, you'd need a big generator. But the reason diesel-electric is so interesting is because you can store that electric (in a battery pack) so that the peak loads (starting from a stop, for example) can be serviced at 1000HP using the batteries, and then, during cruise operations, when you maybe need 100HP to keep rolling, the generator can charge the batteries. Driving is very variable on demand, going up a huge hill with a massive load, might take every HP the engine can put out, however, going downhill on the other side, instead of 450HP, you actually are a negative HP (and, like most electric cars, you can charge the batteries from it). Batteries allow you to harness that energy and deal well with the fluctuating power requirements of a typical drive, you want huge bursts of power followed by a relatively modest power consumption once at cruising speed. That's why you could get away with something like a 100HP generator instead of a 400HP diesel engine, you can run that generator flat out at 100HP the entire time it's running charging batteries, and then, during cruise, which might only take 50HP, the batteries gain a charge. Taking off from a stop, which could be 1000HP, you can use the extra energy stored in the batteries. It's really about finding the right balance, how big a genny to get "unlimited range" without being too big (using too much fuel). How big a battery to provide enough juice for the peak loads and hold enough generated electric to be usable. Too much battery is wasteful, too much genny is wasteful, and too little of each, well.. Eventually you come to a stop (or only have 100HP to start your rig rolling, good luck with that!).
    Good Analysis. This is the method behind the Chevy Volt, it is 100% Electric Drive with the ICE (engine) powering a Generator that is capable of producing slightly more than 100% of the electricity required to propel the vehicle after the energy in the battery has reached 0% (not counting any reserve designed into the Battery Pack to protect the Battery's health). This is different from the Toyota Prius which combines both the ICE and Battery power to propel the vehicle down the road.

    To make this system even better you could make it a Plug-in Hybrid with a significant All-Electric Range.
    David and Peggy
    2019 Ford F350 Lariat, 6.7L Diesel, Dually, Long Bed
    Running with 20k Reese Goosebox (Love It) and Ford Factory "Puck" system.
    Stopping with 8,000 lb Disc Brakes and Titan Hydraulic over Electric Brakes system.
    Powering all this fun with 1200 Watts of Solar, two Tesla, Model S, battery modules, 24 volt Victron Inverter.
    2018 Solitude 310 GK

  10. #70
    Big Traveler
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Gaffney, SC
    Posts
    1,134
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SolarPoweredRV View Post
    Good Analysis. This is the method behind the Chevy Volt, it is 100% Electric Drive with the ICE (engine) powering a Generator that is capable of producing slightly more than 100% of the electricity required to propel the vehicle after the energy in the battery has reached 0% (not counting any reserve designed into the Battery Pack to protect the Battery's health). This is different from the Toyota Prius which combines both the ICE and Battery power to propel the vehicle down the road.

    To make this system even better you could make it a Plug-in Hybrid with a significant All-Electric Range.
    Totally agree. That way you can use batteries a lot of the time, charge at home, short trips, etc and probably never touch the generator at all. But when your towing heavy, or driving a long distance you don't have to try to to jam 100s of KWH into a battery in a "fuel stop", you can drop 1000's of KWH of diesel fuel in 5 mins at any truck stop in the country. Charging 100's of KW's worth of batteries is a major, major problem, one that I don't see any reasonable solution to in the short-medium term. Onboard generators solve that problem and we could have an "electric semi" or "electric F450" tomorrow without inventing entirely new ways to distribute power or building a nuclear reactor next every large truck stop to keep up with the electric requirements of "fueling" 100's of semis per hour.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

DISCLAIMER:This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Grand Design RV, LLC or any of its affiliates. This is an independent site.