Agreed. Assuming based on torque listed the bolt is 1/2" course thread. When anti-seize is used it will lower the fiction coefficient. You are not close to bolt yield so that's not a concern. The aluminum threads have deformed under clamp load. Worn tap during manufacturing or a torque wrench out of calibration are potential causes. Looks like there is the required bolt thread engagement to hold the clamp joint based on bolt size from the pictures. I lean to the possibility the part was defective from Anderson. Hope they honor your claim.
Dutchman2
Also, if the bolt is removed frequently an anti-seize lubricant should be considered because the nut is aluminum so wear becomes more of a concern. If the threads have issues down the road run a tap to clean some and then lubricate on occasion.
After looking closer at the female thread, it appears that there is some thread yielding going on. The tread is raised above the plate surface. A counter sink should have been drilled before tapping. This material could break off and get pulled farther in the part. Also, the aluminum yield strength is very likely somewhat less than even a grade 2 bolt so the specified torque should be less than a steel bolt in a steel nut.
Due to the mentioned yielding, the applied load during use maybe too high for the thread size.
Thanks for looking closer at the threads. Andersen did honor my claim and sent a new aluminum insert and replacement bolt. After thinking this through a little more I decided to use some thread lubricant. I have some nickel based anti-seize. Can I use that?