LCI has trucks on the road the same as GD. One came to where we were at last year in Florida. Fixed our broken spring hanger and he was good.
Hey Jim, thanks! I'm looking forward to getting this done. I'm sure it'll be fine. Kudos to Grand Design for covering this. To their credit, they never questioned whether this would be covered. Their willingness to fly a factory tech out to facilitate the repair is to be commended.
Kim,
How did this turn out?
Kim,
Based on past GDRV handling of issues in general, I suspect this primarily was a dealer issue in not wanting to be bothered with the delamination work. I would bet GDRV will take of you through the better equipped dealer.
Jim,
GDRV admitted somebody on their team dropped the ball. The dealership was never contacted by them. While I don't think it was intentional, it's a far cry from my previous dealings with GDRV customer service. Earlier this spring GDRV repaired and replaced most of the running gear under my trailer at a cost of several thousand dollars. The case was pursued methodically, pertinent info was exchanged between us and I was kept in the loop as each step was taken. It took time and patience and there was never a question about the proper way to accomplish the repair. Excellent customer service. BTW, this was outside the 1 year warranty.
I'm still not convinced the repair method they want to use is a good one.
https://www.granddesignowners.com/f...h-camber-issue-on-Imagine?p=197638#post197638
See post [URL=https://www.granddesignowners.com/forum/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=9]#9 [/URL] .
The delamination on my trailer is virtually identical to this, but in 3 or 4 areas. This gentleman had his slide wall replaced by GDRV without question, as have others on this forum, with great success. I've had two GDRV service mgrs. and two longtime independent repair facilities tell me a reglue and clamp is a bandaid.
Sorry for the bit of a rant, but right now I'm a little perturbed with my CS team. I do thank you for your interest.
Are the wall delaminations discussed above (narrow wall above slide-out) attributed to a loss of frame camber as posted by Sidthekid in thread titled "Need help with camber issue on Imagine"?
Sidthekid had major repairs done (entire wall replacement + supports welded along sides of frame), however the above repairs are only patching the wall skin above slide.
I am concerned about my rig when warranty ends as we have only put 7500 miles on it so far (I suspect all similar trailers may develop this problem at some time).
If the trailer frame is manufactured with a camber (arched up like on-highway flatbeds), such that the frame becomes flat when the weight of box is on it, then a "loss of camber" would imply the frame has sagged even further.
This frame sag between hitch and wheels would produce a compressive force along the top of trailer box that would affect the weakest area of wall the first (i.e. the wall above slide). A weight distributing hitch will add a little more sag since it pushes down on the A-frame about 2ft behind hitch ball (Equilizer type of WD).
I can imagine the two horizontal square aluminum tubes in wall above slide might bow in response to compressive forces thus shearing the adhesive bond between tube and plywood skin.
So, I am wondering if Grand Design is now fixing loss-of-camber problems by repairing the wall damage without the bigger expense of restoring the frame camber.
Seems like a lot of problems with frames and movement regardless of brand. Sorry to hear of your problems. We are considering a 312BHTS but this has me seriously wondering whether GD is for real or it's marketing hype. Right now we have a FR Rockwood (28' box) BH that has had zero issues in three years.
Any news on how it is going?
Brewhedd, thanks for your sympathy.
I seriously believe my trailer is the exception and not the rule. Delamination can happen with any laminated wall and I would bet it doesn't happen any more often with GD than their competition. Remember, you're usually seeing problems posted on the internet. I wouldn't be posting about "no delamination so far".
I doubt this issue was caused by frame movement but am having it checked by the factory.
I initially thought GD Reflections were a bit higher quality unit than others in its class. I no longer posit this. They have great floorplans and interior fit and finish is better than most I've seen but the construction is no better or worse than the rest overall. They use the same components as most others and the wiring and plumbing techniques are just as bad as any of them. They use Lippert frames and in my case suspension. This is not a swing at GD, just my honest opinion.
Any product line is going to have its lemons and I think my trailer is a little "lemonish". But one of the reasons I purchased Grand Design was their reputation for standing behind their product. I have tested this reputation far more than I ever wanted to. At least they are doing their best to make it right although this time I had to work for it. I sincerely hope GD thinks about pulling some money from their warranty budget and applying it to quality control on the assembly line. I've expressed this sentiment to upper management.
BTW, I still love the darn thing and really enjoy using it.
Kim,
When are you getting your rig back? I hope this works out perfectly for you. General RV glassed in two solid panels in the center of the section over my slide where they basically broke up the seam that originally ran from the slide out to the roof. Time will tell if this does not come back where after replacing Chinese tires, and re-working the suspension on my Imagine, I also have love hate thoughts with my purchase. Warranty service has been great but what happens when we are out of warranty? In the auto world we have rigs called shakers where a car can be loaded up and the four corners are hydraulically actuated to simulate various road conditions with inputs to each wheel. Wouldn't it be nice if these camper manufactures had one of these so each new design can be thoroughly tested before launching the product? Or if this is too expensive, a small track around the facility could be devised to have several different types of road conditions built in for durability testing? This is also done in the auto world along with dyno durability testing. However it seems issues are found and get reported by the customers which only then leads to design improvements.